Controversy over the Value of the Hubble Constant
The Hubble constant can be determined by comparing the recessional velocity of galaxies
with their distances. This is difficult, because we must use galaxies at large distances
to ensure that the motion is because of the expansion of space and not just local motion
of the galaxy in space, and determining large distances in astronomy is
often not easy.
There has been
controversy over the present value of the Hubble constant.
Two camps consistently
obtain values that are not consistent with each other within the
expected uncertainty for the
determination.
One group, led by American astronomer
Alan Sandage and Swiss astronomer Gustav Tammann,
favor a value H ~ 50 km/s/Mpc. A second group, led by French astronomer
Gerard de Vaucouleurs, contends that the value of H is closer to 85 km/s/Mpc.
Although this difference is not so large, we shall see that it implies significantly different
ages for the Universe. However, we should set this controversy in perspective. It is
remarkable that despite their differences, both camps would agree that
we know the Hubble constant with an uncertainty that is less than a factor of
two. This is a stunning achievement,
because we shall see that this implies that we probably know the age of the Universe
with the
same degree of certainty. As noted above, most workers now use a value
of the Hubble constant in the vicinity of 65 km/s/Mpc.
|